Friday, March 20, 2009

And Now for Something Completely Different . . .

"Obama and Biden will restore respect for the rule of law and America’s values. They will: reject torture without exception or equivocation, including so-called “enhanced interrogation techniques” like waterboarding; restore the Rule of Law by closing Guantanamo and restoring habeas corpus; and provide our intelligence and law enforcement agencies with the tools they need to track down terrorists without undermining our Constitution or civil liberties." Blueprint for Change Obama and Biden's Plan for America (pdf), page 71

During the 2008 Presidential campaign, Barack Obama and Joe Biden condemned the Bush (R) administration policy of holding prisoners at Guantanamo Bay as "enemy combatants" without benefit of habeas corpus. Candidate Obama also promised (page 5 of pdf) to "eliminate the practice of extreme rendition, where we outsource our torture to other countries."

Hopeful supporters, believing in his ability to bring change by ending the shameful treatment of prisoners and closing the Guantanamo Bay prison and prisons in other countries, voted President Obama into office. The voters expected change. Thus far the only changes seem to be that Obama administration policies are different than Obama campaign promises:

  • A February 17, 2009 NY Times article, "Obama’s War on Terror May Resemble Bush’s in Some Areas," suggests that Obama nominees espouse policies very similar to those of the Bush administration--supporting indefinite detainment of prisoners without trials, and advocating skirting restrictions on torture by sending prisoners to countries with no such restrictions. The article states:

"In little-noticed confirmation testimony recently, Obama nominees endorsed continuing the C.I.A.’s program of transferring prisoners to other countries without legal rights, and indefinitely detaining terrorism suspects without trials even if they were arrested far from a war zone."

The article also points out that President Obama's administration is not as open as he promised during his campaign:

"Mr. Obama’s Justice Department last week told an appeals court that the Bush administration was right to invoke 'state secrets' to shut down a lawsuit by former C.I.A. detainees who say a Boeing subsidiary helped fly them to places where they were tortured."

Apparently we can now conclude that reports of widespread abuses at Guantánamo and reports that many detainees were suffering severe psychological effects after years of isolation were mistaken. We can also conclude once again that the Obama administration thinks the Bush administration policies were correct since the Obama administration policy for treatment of prisoners at Guantánamo shows no significant change from those of the Bush administration.

  • A February 21, 2009 NY Times article, "Obama Upholds Detainee Policy in Afghanistan," describes the Obama administration response to the habeas corpus lawsuit on behalf of prisoners held for years at the US Air Force base prison at Bagram in Afghanistan:

"The Obama team determined that the Bush policy was correct: such prisoners cannot sue for their release."

President Obama's legal team agrees with the contentions of then-President Bush’s legal team that federal judges had no authority under the Constitution to hear challenges by detainees being held at the military prison at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, and elsewhere.

  • A March 13, 2009 NY Times article, "US Won't Label Terror Suspects as Combatants," outlines the Obama administration policy "changes" from the Bush administration with respect to the Guantanamo Bay prison. The Obama administration echoes the Bush administration policy of detaining suspects without benefit of habeas corpus:

"...the president has the authority to detain terrorism suspects there without criminal charges, much as the Bush administration had asserted..."

President Obama's Justice department also "...provided a broad definition of those who can be held, which was not significantly different from the one used by the Bush administration."

Not much change in policy, but they did stop using the words "enemy combatant" when referring to illegally detained prisoners.

The Justice department did supply a new requirement for whom the US government could imprison without benefit of habeas corpus:

"The new definition did add a requirement that to justify detention a detainee would have to have 'substantially supported' Al Qaeda, the Taliban or forces associated with them. But the administration did not define 'substantial,' and the detainees’ lawyers said they doubted that the change would help many of their clients."

So finally, some "substantive" differences between the Obama administration and Bush administration policies towards prisoners:

  • Prisoners will no longer be referred to as "enemy combatants." (Sorry Shakespeare.)
  • Detainees who have not "substantially supported" al Qaeda or the Taliban can be released--pending definition of "substantial." Determination of what constitutes "substantial" requires a mindset capable of debating what the meaning of 'is' is (Youtube video). The "rule of law" is restored.

Now that's the kind of "real change you can believe in" from President Obama. My faith in the republic has been restored; I feel better now. How about all you Obamaphiles?

Monday, March 9, 2009

Crisis as Opportunity

"Rule one: Never allow a crisis to go to waste. They are opportunities to do big things." Rahm Emanuel (D), President Obama's chief of staff.

The machinations of the Federal Reserve and of the federal government this decade as a result of the Bush doctrine caused the current recession. President Obama's February 24, 2009 address to a joint session of Congress latched on to the recent crisis as the latest opportunity for Americans to acquiesce to the continuing aggrandizement of the federal government.

"Madame Speaker, Mr. Vice President, Members of Congress, and the First Lady of the United States: I’ve come here tonight not only to address the distinguished men and women in this great chamber, but to speak frankly and directly to the men and women who sent us here."

Just as Bush (R) and Cheney (R) invaded Afghanistan and Iraq with a strategy articulated by Herman Goering while imprisoned in Nuremberg (pdf), President Obama (D) and his chief of staff continue the Bush tradition of borrowing Nazi tactics by following Joseph Goebbels' strategy of using a crisis to solve a "whole series of problems that could never have been solved in normal times." According to President Obama, the recession is the crisis, and that crisis is an opportunity to move closer to a centrally-planned economy that Americans would not accept otherwise.

"I know that for many Americans watching right now, the state of our economy is a concern that rises above all others. And rightly so. If you haven’t been personally affected by this recession, you probably know someone who has – a friend; a neighbor; a member of your family. You don’t need to hear another list of statistics to know that our economy is in crisis, because you live it every day. It’s the worry you wake up with and the source of sleepless nights. It’s the job you thought you’d retire from but now have lost; the business you built your dreams upon that’s now hanging by a thread; the college acceptance letter your child had to put back in the envelope. The impact of this recession is real, and it is everywhere.

"But while our economy may be weakened and our confidence shaken; though we are living through difficult and uncertain times, tonight I want every American to know this:

"We will rebuild, we will recover, and the United States of America will emerge stronger than before."

There are a lot of empty boarded up buildings on the market, but when President Obama mentions rebuilding, he means re-forming America into a more centrally-planned economy.

Saying it Both Ways

"The weight of this crisis will not determine the destiny of this nation. The answers to our problems don’t lie beyond our reach. They exist in our laboratories and universities; in our fields and our factories; in the imaginations of our entrepreneurs and the pride of the hardest-working people on Earth. Those qualities that have made America the greatest force of progress and prosperity in human history we still possess in ample measure. What is required now is for this country to pull together, confront boldly the challenges we face, and take responsibility for our future once more."

According to President Obama, the answers to our problems are in our laboratories and universities, our fields and factories. Does the President truly believe that's where the answers are? If he does, why do we need the federal government to do anything?

"Now, if we’re honest with ourselves, we’ll admit that for too long, we have not always met these responsibilities – as a government or as a people. I say this not to lay blame or look backwards, but because it is only by understanding how we arrived at this moment that we’ll be able to lift ourselves out of this predicament."

President Obama says he is not laying blame, but then goes ahead and blames our irresponsibility as a government and a people--not as individuals.

Now the Opportunity

"The fact is, our economy did not fall into decline overnight. Nor did all of our problems begin when the housing market collapsed or the stock market sank. We have known for decades that our survival depends on finding new sources of energy. Yet we import more oil today than ever before. The cost of health care eats up more and more of our savings each year, yet we keep delaying reform. Our children will compete for jobs in a global economy that too many of our schools do not prepare them for. And though all these challenges went unsolved, we still managed to spend more money and pile up more debt, both as individuals and through our government, than ever before."

President Obama changes the problem from the housing market collapse to America needing new energy sources and importing too much oil. From there he segues into more public education and health care spending.

The housing market collapse and resultant "credit crisis" is the opportunity for President Obama to increase government involvement in health care and the energy markets while massively increasing taxpayer debt.

The Splinter in Your Brother's Eye

"In other words, we have lived through an era where too often, short-term gains were prized over long-term prosperity; where we failed to look beyond the next payment, the next quarter, or the next election. A surplus became an excuse to transfer wealth to the wealthy instead of an opportunity to invest in our future. Regulations were gutted for the sake of a quick profit at the expense of a healthy market. People bought homes they knew they couldn’t afford from banks and lenders who pushed those bad loans anyway. And all the while, critical debates and difficult decisions were put off for some other time on some other day."

President Obama says we have problems because "we" prized short term gains instead of focusing on the long term. So the President wants a short term injection of money: a short term fix. His speech is confessional.

President Obama talks about surpluses transferring "wealth to the wealthy," and that there was too little regulation. President Obama blames banks and lenders, but not the government regulations pushing home loans. He blames speculators but not the Federal Reserve lowering interest rates close to 0%. He blames the collective us, but not, for example, Franklin Raines, former head of Fannie Mae, and adviser to then Presidential candidate Obama on housing and mortgage matters.

"Well that day of reckoning has arrived, and the time to take charge of our future is here."

"Our future," impossible to calculate, lies ahead of us. Individual families try to plan for their future, parents make wills or trusts, youths start saving, but the government cannot take charge of our future. Not unless it takes charge in the sense of Aldous Huxley's Brave New World.

"Now is the time to act boldly and wisely – to not only revive this economy, but to build a new foundation for lasting prosperity. Now is the time to jumpstart job creation, re-start lending, and invest in areas like energy, health care, and education that will grow our economy, even as we make hard choices to bring our deficit down. That is what my economic agenda is designed to do, and that’s what I’d like to talk to you about tonight."

President Obama repeats his desire to use this crisis as an opportunity for government to seize more power.

He says he will "bring the deficit down," but he increases spending. He blames people for buying houses they couldn't afford, and then spends money the government does not have--the federal deficit is $11 trillion. How is any of what he advocates "taking responsibility for our future"?

President Obama advocates the same behaviors that he says got the economy into this mess. The difference--it's ok when he does it.

Central Planning Anyone?

"It’s an agenda that begins with jobs.

"As soon as I took office, I asked this Congress to send me a recovery plan by President’s Day that would put people back to work and put money in their pockets. Not because I believe in bigger government – I don’t. Not because I’m not mindful of the massive debt we’ve inherited – I am. I called for action because the failure to do so would have cost more jobs and caused more hardships. In fact, a failure to act would have worsened our long-term deficit by assuring weak economic growth for years. That’s why I pushed for quick action. And tonight, I am grateful that this Congress delivered, and pleased to say that the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act is now law."

President Obama doesn't "believe in bigger government," but he makes government bigger.

President Obama says he inherited massive debt, yet while he was in the Senate and a candidate for President, he supported the $700 billion bailout bill, the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, which contributed to almost 7% of the debt in one bill. President Obama asked for and got more spending--$501 billion--in the stimulus bill: the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (pdf).

Believe his actions, not his words.

"Over the next two years, this plan will save or create 3.5 million jobs. More than 90% of these jobs will be in the private sector – jobs rebuilding our roads and bridges; constructing wind turbines and solar panels; laying broadband and expanding mass transit."

Creating jobs is so easy--why didn't anyone think of this before? Just create money out of thin air and put it in people's pockets, and mandate wind turbines, solar panels, lay some broadband, and expand mass transit. If that's all it takes, why do they put counterfeiters in jail?

Economists and the government analyze (pdf) the potential success of the stimulus bill by how much it will increase the GDP. The GDP increases when they hire more government bureaucrats. They could just hire people to dig holes and fill them in and the GDP increases (see BEA GDP definitions: pdf).

The President tells us "more than 90% of these jobs will be in the private sector." But they won't be private sector jobs responding to needs of the market because the federal government is deciding which jobs to stimulate.

"Because of this plan, there are teachers who can now keep their jobs and educate our kids. Health care professionals can continue caring for our sick. There are 57 police officers who are still on the streets of Minneapolis tonight because this plan prevented the layoffs their department was about to make."

Perhaps President Obama is omniscient, he even knows about 57 police officers in Minneapolis. Not quite God who knows of every hair on your head, but at least the equal of Santa Claus. He's demonstrating his ability to head a centrally-planned economy where the federal government makes the decisions.

"Because of this plan, 95% of the working households in America will receive a tax cut – a tax cut that you will see in your paychecks beginning on April 1st.

"Because of this plan, families who are struggling to pay tuition costs will receive a $2,500 tax credit for all four years of college. And Americans who have lost their jobs in this recession will be able to receive extended unemployment benefits and continued health care coverage to help them weather this storm."

Here's some money for you. Now will you please support my plan?

"I know there are some in this chamber and watching at home who are skeptical of whether this plan will work. I understand that skepticism. Here in Washington, we’ve all seen how quickly good intentions can turn into broken promises and wasteful spending. And with a plan of this scale comes enormous responsibility to get it right."

They believe they can centrally plan the economic lives of 300 million Americans. President Obama, his advisors, and Congress will get it right. Trust them, this time is different.

"That is why I have asked Vice President Biden to lead a tough, unprecedented oversight effort – because nobody messes with Joe. I have told each member of my Cabinet as well as mayors and governors across the country that they will be held accountable by me and the American people for every dollar they spend. I have appointed a proven and aggressive Inspector General to ferret out any and all cases of waste and fraud. And we have created a new website called recovery.gov so that every American can find out how and where their money is being spent."

The central planners will manage how every dollar is spent. And the President promises visibility as to where they spend every dollar (or not according to this website). This video shows that the openness promised by the President doesn't apply to the actual legislation in Congress. In it, John Boehner (R) complains about the 1100 page, $787 billion stimulus bill pushed through Congress.

"So the recovery plan we passed is the first step in getting our economy back on track. But it is just the first step. Because even if we manage this plan flawlessly, there will be no real recovery unless we clean up the credit crisis that has severely weakened our financial system."

The "credit crisis" is the problem. But now President Obama calls his recovery plan just "the first step."

Trust Me I'm From the Government

"I want to speak plainly and candidly about this issue tonight, because every American should know that it directly affects you and your family’s well-being. You should also know that the money you’ve deposited in banks across the country is safe; your insurance is secure; and you can rely on the continued operation of our financial system. That is not the source of concern."

President Obama wants you to take responsibility except when it applies to your bank account.

"The concern is that if we do not re-start lending in this country, our recovery will be choked off before it even begins.

"You see, the flow of credit is the lifeblood of our economy. The ability to get a loan is how you finance the purchase of everything from a home to a car to a college education; how stores stock their shelves, farms buy equipment, and businesses make payroll.

"But credit has stopped flowing the way it should. Too many bad loans from the housing crisis have made their way onto the books of too many banks. With so much debt and so little confidence, these banks are now fearful of lending out any more money to households, to businesses, or to each other. When there is no lending, families can’t afford to buy homes or cars. So businesses are forced to make layoffs. Our economy suffers even more, and credit dries up even further."

Contrary to what President Obama says, savings is the lifeblood of our economy. Professor George Reisman of Pepperdine University explains:

"The loss of accumulated savings is at the core of the problem of economic depressions. Recessions and depressions and the losses that accompany them are the result of the attempt to create capital on a foundation of credit expansion rather than saving. Credit expansion is the lending out of new and additional money that is created out of thin air by the banking system, which acts with the encouragement and support of the government. The money so created and lent has the appearance of being new and additional capital, but it is not.

"The fact of its appearing to be new and additional capital creates an exaggerated, false understanding of the amount of capital that is available to support economic activity. Like an individual who believes he has grown rich in the course of a financial bubble, and who is led to adopt a level of living that is beyond his actual means, business firms are led to undertake ventures that are beyond their actual means.

"For an individual consumer, the purchase of an expensive home or automobile in the delusion that he is rich later on turns out to be a major loss in the light of the fact that he cannot actually afford these things and would have been better off had he not bought them. In the same way, business construction projects, stepped up store openings, acquisitions of other firms, and the like, carried out in the delusion of a sudden abundance of available capital, turn out to be sources of major losses when the delusion of additional capital evaporates."

Reisman describes the mechanism of the housing credit problem as credit expansion by lending money "created out of thin air." President Obama wants to solve by doing the very thing that caused it: he wants to expand credit. Have you slowed your spending because you need to save some money? By the President's understanding of economics, you're part of the problem.

A Chicken in Every Pot

"That is why this administration is moving swiftly and aggressively to break this destructive cycle, restore confidence, and re-start lending.

"We will do so in several ways. First, we are creating a new lending fund that represents the largest effort ever to help provide auto loans, college loans, and small business loans to the consumers and entrepreneurs who keep this economy running."

Banks made a lot of bad loans at the instigation of government. Now they've stopped. So the federal government goes into the loan business.

"Second, we have launched a housing plan that will help responsible families facing the threat of foreclosure lower their monthly payments and re-finance their mortgages. It’s a plan that won’t help speculators or that neighbor down the street who bought a house he could never hope to afford, but it will help millions of Americans who are struggling with declining home values – Americans who will now be able to take advantage of the lower interest rates that this plan has already helped bring about. In fact, the average family who re-finances today can save nearly $2000 per year on their mortgage."

The Federal Reserve lowered interest rates, stimulating demand for housing. Federal regulations encouraging home ownership resulted in homes bought by many who couldn't afford their homes. People bid up prices for housing and created a bubble. Now the president wants taxpayers to pay banks to renegotiate mortgage loans.

"Third, we will act with the full force of the federal government to ensure that the major banks that Americans depend on have enough confidence and enough money to lend even in more difficult times. And when we learn that a major bank has serious problems, we will hold accountable those responsible, force the necessary adjustments, provide the support to clean up their balance sheets, and assure the continuity of a strong, viable institution that can serve our people and our economy."

Irresponsible banks made bad loans to irresponsible home buyers. Now that they've stopped acting irresponsibly and stopped loaning as much money, the solution is to loan more?

"I understand that on any given day, Wall Street may be more comforted by an approach that gives banks bailouts with no strings attached, and that holds nobody accountable for their reckless decisions. But such an approach won’t solve the problem. And our goal is to quicken the day when we re-start lending to the American people and American business and end this crisis once and for all.

"I intend to hold these banks fully accountable for the assistance they receive, and this time, they will have to clearly demonstrate how taxpayer dollars result in more lending for the American taxpayer. This time, CEOs won’t be able to use taxpayer money to pad their paychecks or buy fancy drapes or disappear on a private jet. Those days are over."

President Obama might want to consider Stanford Kurland, former 2nd in charge at Countrywide Finance who describes his "new business buying up delinquent home mortgages that the government took over from other failed banks, sometimes for pennies on the dollar," as "off-the-charts-good" in a March 3, 2009 NY Times article.

According to a March 6, 2009 Washington Post article: "The government is seeking to resuscitate the nation's crippled financial system by forging an alliance with the very outfits that most benefited from the bonanza preceding the collapse of the credit markets: hedge funds and private-equity firms." The Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility, or TALF program loans taxpayer money to the wealthy to encourage them to loan the money to consumers.

"Still, this plan will require significant resources from the federal government – and yes, probably more than we’ve already set aside. But while the cost of action will be great, I can assure you that the cost of inaction will be far greater, for it could result in an economy that sputters along for not months or years, but perhaps a decade. That would be worse for our deficit, worse for business, worse for you, and worse for the next generation. And I refuse to let that happen."

The President can see into the future.

"I understand that when the last administration asked this Congress to provide assistance for struggling banks, Democrats and Republicans alike were infuriated by the mismanagement and results that followed. So were the American taxpayers. So was I."

Apparently President Obama's powers of clairvoyance only began when he became President. He must have forgotten that he voted for the bailout. Apparently he didn't anticipate any problems of "mismanagement" at the time.

"So I know how unpopular it is to be seen as helping banks right now, especially when everyone is suffering in part from their bad decisions. I promise you – I get it.

"But I also know that in a time of crisis, we cannot afford to govern out of anger, or yield to the politics of the moment. My job – our job – is to solve the problem. Our job is to govern with a sense of responsibility. I will not spend a single penny for the purpose of rewarding a single Wall Street executive, but I will do whatever it takes to help the small business that can’t pay its workers or the family that has saved and still can’t get a mortgage."

The President is still pushing mortgages for "the family that has saved and still can't get a mortgage."

"That’s what this is about. It’s not about helping banks – it’s about helping people. Because when credit is available again, that young family can finally buy a new home. And then some company will hire workers to build it. And then those workers will have money to spend, and if they can get a loan too, maybe they’ll finally buy that car, or open their own business. Investors will return to the market, and American families will see their retirement secured once more. Slowly, but surely, confidence will return, and our economy will recover."

So people are not buying things that they can't afford; the nation of irresponsible speculators has slowed their spending. Yet the President wants them to start spending again?

"So I ask this Congress to join me in doing whatever proves necessary. Because we cannot consign our nation to an open-ended recession. And to ensure that a crisis of this magnitude never happens again, I ask Congress to move quickly on legislation that will finally reform our outdated regulatory system. It is time to put in place tough, new common-sense rules of the road so that our financial market rewards drive and innovation, and punishes short-cuts and abuse."

What if the same accounting rules applied to business were applied to the federal government that pumps $1.5 trillion that it doesn't have into the economy?

"The recovery plan and the financial stability plan are the immediate steps we’re taking to revive our economy in the short-term. But the only way to fully restore America’s economic strength is to make the long-term investments that will lead to new jobs, new industries, and a renewed ability to compete with the rest of the world. The only way this century will be another American century is if we confront at last the price of our dependence on oil and the high cost of health care; the schools that aren’t preparing our children and the mountain of debt they stand to inherit. That is our responsibility."

President Obama argues again for a centrally-planned economy. Individuals are not spending as much money, and some banks are not lending. The federal government will overrule these individual decisions and spend money it doesn't have.

"In the next few days, I will submit a budget to Congress. So often, we have come to view these documents as simply numbers on a page or laundry lists of programs. I see this document differently. I see it as a vision for America – as a blueprint for our future."

Central planning by the government-- a $3.6 trillion blueprint for our future.

"My budget does not attempt to solve every problem or address every issue. It reflects the stark reality of what we’ve inherited – a trillion dollar deficit, a financial crisis, and a costly recession."

Again President Obama forgets that he voted for that deficit.

Is the Government What Makes America Great?

"Given these realities, everyone in this chamber – Democrats and Republicans – will have to sacrifice some worthy priorities for which there are no dollars. And that includes me.

"But that does not mean we can afford to ignore our long-term challenges. I reject the view that says our problems will simply take care of themselves; that says government has no role in laying the foundation for our common prosperity."

Common prosperity--how is that determined? Paying money to specific industries such as banks and car makers is not for our common prosperity.

"For history tells a different story. History reminds us that at every moment of economic upheaval and transformation, this nation has responded with bold action and big ideas. In the midst of civil war, we laid railroad tracks from one coast to another that spurred commerce and industry. From the turmoil of the Industrial Revolution came a system of public high schools that prepared our citizens for a new age. In the wake of war and depression, the GI Bill sent a generation to college and created the largest middle-class in history. And a twilight struggle for freedom led to a nation of highways, an American on the moon, and an explosion of technology that still shapes our world.

"In each case, government didn’t supplant private enterprise; it catalyzed private enterprise. It created the conditions for thousands of entrepreneurs and new businesses to adapt and to thrive."

The federal government wiped out the Indians in the path of the railroad

President Obama's stimulus plan purports to increase manufacturing here. Why does he describe the industrial revolution negatively?

Public high schools and the GI Bill have arguably set the stage for a nation set to be nationalized.

Eisenhauer's highways, maintained by government, are one excuse for the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009.

NASA epitomizes government inefficiency when it ignores safety precautions that lead to a shuttle blowing up.

President Obama Seizes the Opportunity

"We are a nation that has seen promise amid peril, and claimed opportunity from ordeal. Now we must be that nation again. That is why, even as it cuts back on the programs we don’t need, the budget I submit will invest in the three areas that are absolutely critical to our economic future: energy, health care, and education. "

Remember, President Obama started his speech with the recession? Despite his saying "it begins with energy," he started with the recession. Here he segues into more federal government control of energy, health care, and education.

"It begins with energy.

"We know the country that harnesses the power of clean, renewable energy will lead the 21st century. And yet, it is China that has launched the largest effort in history to make their economy energy efficient. We invented solar technology, but we’ve fallen behind countries like Germany and Japan in producing it. New plug-in hybrids roll off our assembly lines, but they will run on batteries made in Korea.

"Well I do not accept a future where the jobs and industries of tomorrow take root beyond our borders – and I know you don’t either. It is time for America to lead again."

President Obama espouses autarky, a self-sufficient national economy; the fascist economics of Mussolini and Hitler were the same.

"Thanks to our recovery plan, we will double this nation’s supply of renewable energy in the next three years. We have also made the largest investment in basic research funding in American history – an investment that will spur not only new discoveries in energy, but breakthroughs in medicine, science, and technology.

"We will soon lay down thousands of miles of power lines that can carry new energy to cities and towns across this country. And we will put Americans to work making our homes and buildings more efficient so that we can save billions of dollars on our energy bills."

Global Warming Crisis

"But to truly transform our economy, protect our security, and save our planet from the ravages of climate change, we need to ultimately make clean, renewable energy the profitable kind of energy. So I ask this Congress to send me legislation that places a market-based cap on carbon pollution and drives the production of more renewable energy in America. And to support that innovation, we will invest fifteen billion dollars a year to develop technologies like wind power and solar power; advanced biofuels, clean coal, and more fuel-efficient cars and trucks built right here in America."

President Obama also wants to use the "Global Warming crisis" as an opportunity to increase government central planning of the energy industry.

"As for our auto industry, everyone recognizes that years of bad decision-making and a global recession have pushed our automakers to the brink. We should not, and will not, protect them from their own bad practices. But we are committed to the goal of a re-tooled, re-imagined auto industry that can compete and win. Millions of jobs depend on it. Scores of communities depend on it. And I believe the nation that invented the automobile cannot walk away from it."

The President proves he's not omniscient, despite his master plan to save the economic lives of 300 million people. The automobile was invented by a person and not a nation, and not in America. Karl Benz invented the car in Germany.

"None of this will come without cost, nor will it be easy. But this is America. We don’t do what’s easy. We do what is necessary to move this country forward."

American car manufacturers failed to reliably negotiate the regulatory environment set up by the federal government, but President Obama knows best what they should be doing, and will now be directing them through the Secretary of the Treasury and "almost car czar" financier Steven Rattner. Rattner's experience as a former reporter for the New York Times and being married to a former national finance chair of the Democratic National Committee should allow him to bring a fresh outlook to the car business.

National Health Care

"For that same reason, we must also address the crushing cost of health care.

"This is a cost that now causes a bankruptcy in America every thirty seconds. By the end of the year, it could cause 1.5 million Americans to lose their homes. In the last eight years, premiums have grown four times faster than wages. And in each of these years, one million more Americans have lost their health insurance. It is one of the major reasons why small businesses close their doors and corporations ship jobs overseas. And it’s one of the largest and fastest-growing parts of our budget.

"Given these facts, we can no longer afford to put health care reform on hold."

This link to an Excel spreadsheet on a US government website lists the total business and nonbusiness bankruptcy cases by chapter of the bankruptcy code in US Bankruptcy courts for the year ending June 2008. There are 967,831 bankruptcy filings, just under one million for the year. One non-leap year has 525,600 minutes, so there is a bankruptcy approximately every 30 seconds.

The spreadsheet tracks all bankruptcy filings, but does not track the cause of the bankruptcy. There are many reasons people file for bankruptcy. Not all of them are because of health care costs. President Obama attributes all of the bankruptcies in the US to high healthcare costs.

Either the President who pretends to know what's best for 300 million Americans is in error by stating that all of the bankruptcies in bankruptcy courts are due to "the crushing cost of health care," or the President does know that the bankruptcies are not all due to health care costs and is lying.

"Already, we have done more to advance the cause of health care reform in the last thirty days than we have in the last decade. When it was days old, this Congress passed a law to provide and protect health insurance for eleven million American children whose parents work full-time. Our recovery plan will invest in electronic health records and new technology that will reduce errors, bring down costs, ensure privacy, and save lives. It will launch a new effort to conquer a disease that has touched the life of nearly every American by seeking a cure for cancer in our time. And it makes the largest investment ever in preventive care, because that is one of the best ways to keep our people healthy and our costs under control.

"This budget builds on these reforms. It includes an historic commitment to comprehensive health care reform – a down-payment on the principle that we must have quality, affordable health care for every American. It’s a commitment that’s paid for in part by efficiencies in our system that are long overdue. And it’s a step we must take if we hope to bring down our deficit in the years to come."

Efficiencies in a government system? What principle is involved so that "we must have quality, affordable health care for every American"? Do people have a right to health care?

"Now, there will be many different opinions and ideas about how to achieve reform, and that is why I’m bringing together businesses and workers, doctors and health care providers, Democrats and Republicans to begin work on this issue next week.

"I suffer no illusions that this will be an easy process. It will be hard. But I also know that nearly a century after Teddy Roosevelt first called for reform, the cost of our health care has weighed down our economy and the conscience of our nation long enough. So let there be no doubt: health care reform cannot wait, it must not wait, and it will not wait another year."

Does the nation have a conscience? Or do people? Bush's Homeland Security, the Fatherland of the Nazis, Mother Russia, and the national conscience: all examples of collectivist reasoning.

Education

"The third challenge we must address is the urgent need to expand the promise of education in America.

"In a global economy where the most valuable skill you can sell is your knowledge, a good education is no longer just a pathway to opportunity – it is a pre-requisite.

"Right now, three-quarters of the fastest-growing occupations require more than a high school diploma. And yet, just over half of our citizens have that level of education. We have one of the highest high school dropout rates of any industrialized nation. And half of the students who begin college never finish.

"This is a prescription for economic decline, because we know the countries that out-teach us today will out-compete us tomorrow. That is why it will be the goal of this administration to ensure that every child has access to a complete and competitive education – from the day they are born to the day they begin a career.

"Already, we have made an historic investment in education through the economic recovery plan. We have dramatically expanded early childhood education and will continue to improve its quality, because we know that the most formative learning comes in those first years of life. We have made college affordable for nearly seven million more students. And we have provided the resources necessary to prevent painful cuts and teacher layoffs that would set back our children’s progress.

"But we know that our schools don’t just need more resources. They need more reform. That is why this budget creates new incentives for teacher performance; pathways for advancement, and rewards for success. We’ll invest in innovative programs that are already helping schools meet high standards and close achievement gaps. And we will expand our commitment to charter schools."

The President is not just planning to spend more money on education, he wants to "reform" schools.

Ask What You Can Do For Your Country

"It is our responsibility as lawmakers and educators to make this system work. But it is the responsibility of every citizen to participate in it. And so tonight, I ask every American to commit to at least one year or more of higher education or career training. This can be community college or a four-year school; vocational training or an apprenticeship. But whatever the training may be, every American will need to get more than a high school diploma. And dropping out of high school is no longer an option. It’s not just quitting on yourself, it’s quitting on your country – and this country needs and values the talents of every American. That is why we will provide the support necessary for you to complete college and meet a new goal: by 2020, America will once again have the highest proportion of college graduates in the world.

"I know that the price of tuition is higher than ever, which is why if you are willing to volunteer in your neighborhood or give back to your community or serve your country, we will make sure that you can afford a higher education. And to encourage a renewed spirit of national service for this and future generations, I ask this Congress to send me the bipartisan legislation that bears the name of Senator Orrin Hatch as well as an American who has never stopped asking what he can do for his country – Senator Edward Kennedy.

"These education policies will open the doors of opportunity for our children. But it is up to us to ensure they walk through them. In the end, there is no program or policy that can substitute for a mother or father who will attend those parent/teacher conferences, or help with homework after dinner, or turn off the TV, put away the video games, and read to their child. I speak to you not just as a President, but as a father when I say that responsibility for our children's education must begin at home."

"Responsibility for our children's education must begin at home," but the government is usurping that responsibility with "dramatically expanded early childhood education," especially "because we know that the most formative learning comes in those first years of life." Feed your young to the system at an early age. If you're really unlucky, they'll grow up pledging to serve their President.

The Next Crisis in the Making

"There is, of course, another responsibility we have to our children. And that is the responsibility to ensure that we do not pass on to them a debt they cannot pay. With the deficit we inherited, the cost of the crisis we face, and the long-term challenges we must meet, it has never been more important to ensure that as our economy recovers, we do what it takes to bring this deficit down."

Doublespeak at its best, the President has come full circle, spending $1.6 trillion that the federal government doesn't have, giving himself a Herculean task--a future crisis--that he already warns us about.

"I’m proud that we passed the recovery plan free of earmarks, and I want to pass a budget next year that ensures that each dollar we spend reflects only our most important national priorities.

"Yesterday, I held a fiscal summit where I pledged to cut the deficit in half by the end of my first term in office. My administration has also begun to go line by line through the federal budget in order to eliminate wasteful and ineffective programs. As you can imagine, this is a process that will take some time. But we’re starting with the biggest lines. We have already identified two trillion dollars in savings over the next decade."

President Obama said this about saving $2 trillion after signing a bill that spends $501 billion, calling for another bill that spends $410 billion, and supporting the $700 billion bailout of October 2008.

"In this budget, we will end education programs that don’t work and end direct payments to large agribusinesses that don’t need them. We’ll eliminate the no-bid contracts that have wasted billions in Iraq, and reform our defense budget so that we’re not paying for Cold War-era weapons systems we don’t use. We will root out the waste, fraud, and abuse in our Medicare program that doesn’t make our seniors any healthier, and we will restore a sense of fairness and balance to our tax code by finally ending the tax breaks for corporations that ship our jobs overseas.

"In order to save our children from a future of debt, we will also end the tax breaks for the wealthiest 2% of Americans. But let me perfectly clear, because I know you’ll hear the same old claims that rolling back these tax breaks means a massive tax increase on the American people: if your family earns less than $250,000 a year, you will not see your taxes increased a single dime. I repeat: not one single dime. In fact, the recovery plan provides a tax cut – that’s right, a tax cut – for 95% of working families. And these checks are on the way.

"To preserve our long-term fiscal health, we must also address the growing costs in Medicare and Social Security. Comprehensive health care reform is the best way to strengthen Medicare for years to come. And we must also begin a conversation on how to do the same for Social Security, while creating tax-free universal savings accounts for all Americans.

"Finally, because we’re also suffering from a deficit of trust, I am committed to restoring a sense of honesty and accountability to our budget. That is why this budget looks ahead ten years and accounts for spending that was left out under the old rules – and for the first time, that includes the full cost of fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan. For seven years, we have been a nation at war. No longer will we hide its price."

More spending, higher taxes.

Guns and Butter

"We are now carefully reviewing our policies in both wars, and I will soon announce a way forward in Iraq that leaves Iraq to its people and responsibly ends this war."

The President later announced he would pull "combat troops" out of Iraq within 19 months, but leave 50,000 troops in Iraq until the end of 2011.

"And with our friends and allies, we will forge a new and comprehensive strategy for Afghanistan and Pakistan to defeat al Qaeda and combat extremism. Because I will not allow terrorists to plot against the American people from safe havens half a world away."

The President will continue the Bush policy of undeclared wars in the Middle East.

"As we meet here tonight, our men and women in uniform stand watch abroad and more are readying to deploy. To each and every one of them, and to the families who bear the quiet burden of their absence, Americans are united in sending one message: we honor your service, we are inspired by your sacrifice, and you have our unyielding support. To relieve the strain on our forces, my budget increases the number of our soldiers and Marines. And to keep our sacred trust with those who serve, we will raise their pay, and give our veterans the expanded health care and benefits that they have earned.

"To overcome extremism, we must also be vigilant in upholding the values our troops defend – because there is no force in the world more powerful than the example of America. That is why I have ordered the closing of the detention center at Guantanamo Bay, and will seek swift and certain justice for captured terrorists – because living our values doesn’t make us weaker, it makes us safer and it makes us stronger. And that is why I can stand here tonight and say without exception or equivocation that the United States of America does not torture."

What about the prisons used by America in foreign countries?

"In words and deeds, we are showing the world that a new era of engagement has begun. For we know that America cannot meet the threats of this century alone, but the world cannot meet them without America. We cannot shun the negotiating table, nor ignore the foes or forces that could do us harm. We are instead called to move forward with the sense of confidence and candor that serious times demand.

"To seek progress toward a secure and lasting peace between Israel and her neighbors, we have appointed an envoy to sustain our effort. To meet the challenges of the 21st century – from terrorism to nuclear proliferation; from pandemic disease to cyber threats to crushing poverty – we will strengthen old alliances, forge new ones, and use all elements of our national power.

"And to respond to an economic crisis that is global in scope, we are working with the nations of the G-20 to restore confidence in our financial system, avoid the possibility of escalating protectionism, and spur demand for American goods in markets across the globe. For the world depends on us to have a strong economy, just as our economy depends on the strength of the world’s.

"As we stand at this crossroads of history, the eyes of all people in all nations are once again upon us – watching to see what we do with this moment; waiting for us to lead.

"Those of us gathered here tonight have been called to govern in extraordinary times. It is a tremendous burden, but also a great privilege – one that has been entrusted to few generations of Americans. For in our hands lies the ability to shape our world for good or for ill."

Within his "hands lies the ability to shape our world for good or for ill." President Obama sees a massive role for government in everyone's life. He doesn't even pretend to believe in limited government.

Heartwarming Examples of Why We Need Central Planning

"I know that it is easy to lose sight of this truth – to become cynical and doubtful; consumed with the petty and the trivial.

"But in my life, I have also learned that hope is found in unlikely places; that inspiration often comes not from those with the most power or celebrity, but from the dreams and aspirations of Americans who are anything but ordinary.

"I think about Leonard Abess, the bank president from Miami who reportedly cashed out of his company, took a $60 million bonus, and gave it out to all 399 people who worked for him, plus another 72 who used to work for him. He didn’t tell anyone, but when the local newspaper found out, he simply said, ''I knew some of these people since I was 7 years old. I didn't feel right getting the money myself.'

"I think about Greensburg, Kansas, a town that was completely destroyed by a tornado, but is being rebuilt by its residents as a global example of how clean energy can power an entire community – how it can bring jobs and businesses to a place where piles of bricks and rubble once lay. 'The tragedy was terrible,' said one of the men who helped them rebuild. 'But the folks here know that it also provided an incredible opportunity.'

"And I think about Ty’Sheoma Bethea, the young girl from that school I visited in Dillon, South Carolina – a place where the ceilings leak, the paint peels off the walls, and they have to stop teaching six times a day because the train barrels by their classroom. She has been told that her school is hopeless, but the other day after class she went to the public library and typed up a letter to the people sitting in this room. She even asked her principal for the money to buy a stamp. The letter asks us for help, and says, 'We are just students trying to become lawyers, doctors, congressmen like yourself and one day president, so we can make a change to not just the state of South Carolina but also the world. We are not quitters.' "

Ty’Sheoma Bethea is learning what President Obama wants us all to learn--depend on the government. All of his examples are to make us feel, not think.

"We are not quitters.

"These words and these stories tell us something about the spirit of the people who sent us here. They tell us that even in the most trying times, amid the most difficult circumstances, there is a generosity, a resilience, a decency, and a determination that perseveres; a willingness to take responsibility for our future and for posterity.

"Their resolve must be our inspiration. Their concerns must be our cause. And we must show them and all our people that we are equal to the task before us."

Do you feel good now? Ready to support the President?

Mom, the Flag, and Apple Pie

"I know that we haven’t agreed on every issue thus far, and there are surely times in the future when we will part ways. But I also know that every American who is sitting here tonight loves this country and wants it to succeed. That must be the starting point for every debate we have in the coming months, and where we return after those debates are done. That is the foundation on which the American people expect us to build common ground."

What if loving liberty means wanting the President's plan for the nationalization of health care and increased control of the economy to fail? Then there is no common ground.

"And if we do – if we come together and lift this nation from the depths of this crisis; if we put our people back to work and restart the engine of our prosperity; if we confront without fear the challenges of our time and summon that enduring spirit of an America that does not quit, then someday years from now our children can tell their children that this was the time when we performed, in the words that are carved into this very chamber, "something worthy to be remembered." Thank you, God Bless you, and may God Bless the United States of America."

Professor Reisman's analysis is more likely to be remembered by our grandchildren:

"Even though stimulus packages may be able to generate additional economic activity, they cannot achieve any kind of meaningful economic recovery. Their actual effect is the creation of a system of public welfare in the guise of work. That is in the nature of employing people not for the sake of the products they produce but having them produce products for the sake of being able to employ them.

"But stimulus packages are much more costly than simple welfare. On top of the welfare dole that allows unemployed workers to live, stimulus packages add the cost of the materials and equipment that the workers use in producing their pretended products.

"The work created by stimulus packages is a make-believe work that is carried on at the expense of the rest of the economic system. It draws products and services produced in the rest of the economic system and returns to the rest of the economic system little or nothing in the way of goods or services that would constitute value for value or payment of any kind. In other words, stimulus packages and the needless work they create cause the great majority of other people to be poorer."