“Then the face of Big Brother faded away again, and instead the three slogans of the Party stood out in bold capitals:
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH”
Slogans from Orwell’s dystopian novel Nineteen Eighty-Four are absurd—oxymoronic gibberish—contradictory words that don’t belong in the same sentence together except as an example of opposites. Double talk.
How does war equal peace?
Or freedom equal slavery?
Is we ever stronger when we is ignorant?
The slogans are born of “doublethink”: a word Orwell coined for a technique his fictional future dictatorship used to control its citizens. The dictatorship controls citizens’ access to facts, limits their vocabularies, and clutters their minds with inconsistencies. Those ruled in Orwell’s novel live with their heads filled with contradictory concepts for so long that they lose the ability to distinguish fact from fiction. They can’t think clearly—which makes it very easy for their rulers to lie to them.
Doublethink goes beyond gullibility. Double-thinkers willingly switch off their reason. Point out the lies and they get angry—not at the liar for deceiving them, but at the messenger for stating the obvious—they’ve been believing a lie.
But Nineteen Eighty-Four is only a story. Doublethink doesn’t happen in real life does it?
PACIFICATION
OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM
FIGHT FOR PEACE
VOLUNTARY COMPLIANCE
DEFICIT SPENDING
SOCIAL SECURITY TRUST FUND
On August 31, 2010, Obama disclosed that a “transitional force of US troops” would remain in Iraq. Translation: troops remain in Iraq.
Obama’s historic speech fulfilled his campaign promises to remove combat troops from Iraq by “the summer of 2010” and also to keep “a residual force” in Iraq.[6][7]
Does it sound contradictory that Obama ran for President promising to withdraw troops from Iraq while also promising to leave troops in Iraq? Together the two promises meant Obama would leave troops in Iraq, he just wouldn’t call them “combat” troops.
Both Bush and Obama have told American citizens that combat operations are over in Iraq, yet both have left combat troops in Iraq after announcing the end of combat operations.
Fifty thousand US troops remain in Iraq with an additional 100,000 US mercenary soldiers after Obama announced the end of “our combat mission.” The Iraqi Defense Minister, Abdul Obeidi says US troops may be in Iraq forever:
"Maybe endlessly," said Obeidi when asked how long U.S. support may be necessary. "As long as I have an army and I'm a Third World country, and I can't pretend that I'm better than that … I will need assistance.”[10]Are we already double-thinkers? Our leaders apparently think so. For them: War is Peace.
_______________________________
[1] Nineteen Eighty-Four, by George Orwell, New American Library, N.Y., 1949, p. 17.
[2] JFK: the CIA, Vietnam, and the plot to assassinate John F. Kennedy, by By Leroy Fletcher Prouty, Kensington Publishing Corp., N.Y., 1996, p. 250.
[3] Comeback America: Turning the Country Around and Restoring Fiscal Responsibility, By David M. Walker, Random House, N.Y., 2009, p.72, (Accessed at http://books.google.com/books?id=7Ga0TEYaScIC&lpg=PR2&ots=TjzWPcLWpF&dq=Comeback%20America%3A%20Turning%20the%20Country%20Around%20and%20Restoring%20Fiscal%20Responsibility&pg=PA72#v=onepage&q&f=false on Sept. 27, 2010).
[4] “Obama Declares an End to Combat Mission in Iraq,” By HELENE COOPER and SHERYL GAY STOLBERG, August 31, 2010, NY Times, (Accessed at http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/01/world/01military.html?_r=1&th=&emc=th&pagewanted=all on Sept 3, 2010)
[5] “Text Of Bush Speech; President Declares End To Major Combat In Iraq,” By Jarrett Murphy, May 1, 2003, (Accessed at http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/05/01/iraq/main551946.shtml on Sept. 29, 2010).
[6] “Blueprint for Change Obama and Biden’s Plan for America” (pdf) p. 69, (Accessed at http://www.barackobama.com/pdf/ObamaBlueprintForChange.pdf on September 11, 2010).
[7] “Remarks by the President in Address to the Nation on the End of Combat Operations in Iraq,” August 31, 2010, (Accessed at http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2010/08/31/remarks-president-address-nation-end-combat-operations-iraq on September 11, 2010).
“Going forward, a transitional force of U.S. troops will remain in Iraq with a different mission: advising and assisting Iraq’s Security Forces, supporting Iraqi troops in targeted counterterrorism missions, and protecting our civilians. Consistent with our agreement with the Iraqi government, all U.S. troops will leave by the end of next year. As our military draws down, our dedicated civilians -- diplomats, aid workers, and advisors -- are moving into the lead to support Iraq as it strengthens its government, resolves political disputes, resettles those displaced by war, and builds ties with the region and the world. That’s a message that Vice President Biden is delivering to the Iraqi people through his visit there today.”[8] “More Post-Combat U.S. Gunfire in Iraq,” By TIMOTHY WILLIAMS, NY Times, September 12, 2010, (Accessed at http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/13/world/middleeast/13iraq.html?_r=1&hp on Sept 12, 2010).
[9] “Iraqi-U.S. Raid Near Falluja Leaves 7 Dead,” By TIMOTHY WILLIAMS and DURAID ADNAN, NY Times, September 15, 2010, (Accessed at http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/16/world/middleeast/16iraq.html?_r=1&th&emc=th on September 18, 2010).
[10] “Iraqi official foresees a U.S. military presence until 2016,” By Liz Sly, Los Angeles Times, September 8, 2010, (Accessed at http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-iraq-troop-presence-20100909,0,954392,print.story on Sept. 29, 2010).
2 comments:
You are undoubtedly also familiar with Orwell's "Politics and the English Language," which concludes, "Political language...is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind." Elsewhere in this brilliant essay, he argues that "...political speech and writing are largely the defense of the indefensible."
Thus, after wiping out an entire Vietnamese village of non-combatants, a U.S. Army major could announce, with straight face but twisted logic, "It was necessary to destroy the town in order to save it." That is both doublespeak and double-talk.
More than forty years later, my vehemently anti-war friends can proudly declare their "support," thin as it is, for "our troops"; and they can attach those nifty little magnetic ribbons to the rear of their half-ton SUV's. But they cannot see the contradiction in opposing a war that is actively being waged by the very troops whom they support.
The real problem with political language, of course, is that it turns the brain into mush. The only efficacious cure for this affliction is critical thinking, a skill that three-fourths of the U.S. population simply never learned--if, indeed, it was ever taught--in school.
This link has the essay:
http://langs.eserver.org/politics-english-language.txt
Post a Comment